@TeacherToolkit
Ross Morrison McGill founded @TeacherToolkit in 2007 and is widely recognised as one of the leading influencers in education in the UK and across the world. In 2015, he was named among The Sunday Times/Debrett’s 500 Most Influential People in Britain for his impact on…
Read more about @TeacherToolkit
Why do students forget explanations moments after teachers provide them?
Working memory is limited; when lessons overload working meory, students lose the steps—so teaching must reduce cognitive clutter and design learning more carefully.
Working memory is not failure
Working memory is the mental workspace students use to hold and manipulate information while listening, reading, writing, or following a sequence of steps.
When too much information arrives at once, this working memory system overloads and learning stalls—even when students appear attentive (Baddeley, 1992).
In classrooms, working memory limits are most visible when students forget instructions (EEF, 2024), miss steps in a process, or produce work that looks careless rather than confused. These moments are often misinterpreted as effort problems, when they are more accurately capacity issues.
Working memory is not a fixed trait; it fluctuates with task complexity, language demand, stress, and prior knowledge. The same student can succeed in one lesson and struggle in another with similar content (CNE, University of Cambridge), simply because the cognitive demand has changed.
Why overload creates fragile understanding
When working memory is overloaded, students cope in the moment but fail to secure learning in long-term memory. This creates fragile understanding: surface-level responses, copying without comprehension, and errors that appear random but are entirely predictable.
For school and college leaders, working memory explains persistent challenges in behaviour, SEND, literacy, and attainment gaps. If instructions, routines, and explanations vary from lesson to lesson, students spend their cognitive effort decoding what to do rather than learning what matters. Consistency and clarity of instruction is essential.
This also matters for professional judgement: teaching quality cannot be inferred from visible engagement alone (Ofsted, 2022). A quiet classroom may still be overloaded, while productive struggle can mask instructional overload.
A simple framework teachers can use
A simple classroom framework helps teachers plan with working memory in mind:
Reduce → Chunk → Rehearse → Retrieve.
- Reduce cognitive clutter by removing unnecessary text, competing visuals, and multiple instructions.
- Chunk content into visible steps, modelling one example before independence.
- Rehearse routines so students do not need to hold instructions in mind.
- Retrieve key prior knowledge before new content so working memory is freed for learning.
Across classrooms, the most effective teachers design lessons so students think about content, not instructions.
Reflection questions for teachers:
- Where might working memory overload occur in lessons?
- Which instructions could be removed rather than repeated?
- How could steps be made visible instead of spoken?
- How would teachers rehearse routines so students act without prompting?
- In primary classrooms, how could tasks be simplified without lowering ambition?
- In secondary classrooms, where does modelling end too late?
- In further education, how could technical language be reduced without diluting content?
- Which retrieval prompts would activate the most useful prior knowledge?
- How would leaders coach for clarity without increasing workload?
- What evidence shows that clearer instruction improves accuracy, not compliance?
Learning does not fail because students lack effort; it fails when instructional design exceeds working memory capacity—placing the responsibility for success firmly back on how teaching is structured.
The classroom bottleneck is unlocked through clearer classroom design, not harder work.
Get in touch if you need any support.
