Close Menu
bkngpnarnaul
  • Home
  • Education
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Math
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Teacher
  • E-Learning
    • Educational Technology
  • Health Education
    • Special Education
  • Higher Education
  • IELTS
  • Language Learning
  • Study Abroad

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
What's Hot

K-12 Gamification: A Guide For Publishers

September 23, 2025

Can Plantar Fasciitis Cause Knee Pain? Know the Link

September 23, 2025

The Purpose of a Classroom Observation for Gathering Data

September 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, September 23
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
bkngpnarnaul
  • Home
  • Education
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Math
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Teacher
  • E-Learning
    • Educational Technology
  • Health Education
    • Special Education
  • Higher Education
  • IELTS
  • Language Learning
  • Study Abroad
bkngpnarnaul
Home»Math»The illusory consensus of math reform. – Math with Bad Drawings
Math

The illusory consensus of math reform. – Math with Bad Drawings

adminBy adminJune 10, 20251 Comment4 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard Threads
The illusory consensus of math reform. – Math with Bad Drawings
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link


When my first book Math with Bad Drawings came out, I kept having a strange experience.

“Yes!” a stranger would say, pointing at the stick figure on the cover. “We need more of this.”

a thing we need more of! (apparently)

My enthusiastic supporter had, until 30 seconds prior, never heard of the book. They still hadn’t cracked the spine. I was honored by the support, but it was obvious that I hadn’t yet earned it. For all they knew, I had written 376 pages of vulgar limericks. What convinced them that I was on the right path?

I’ve come to see this as a basic dynamic in math education reform: an illusory spirit of consensus. Clearly math education needs more something. But more what?

One popular answer: “more data science.” Let’s renounce all of those fusty, old-fashioned trigonometric formulas. Instead, fill math class with 21st-century virtues: data visualization, probabilistic thinking, and statistical literacy. This isn’t necessarily about new pedagogy; it’s about new content. It’s about re-centering math class on techniques that will cash out, on skills that students might actually apply.

Another popular answer: “more student-centered.” Let’s banish all tasks mechanical and rote. Instead, fill math class with open-ended puzzles, inquiry-based learning, and creative projects. This isn’t necessarily about new content; it’s about new pedagogy. It’s about re-centering math class on the voices, the ideas, and the ingenuity of the students themselves.

I see value in both of these approaches (and many others besides). My first book, Math with Bad Drawings, with its long sections on statistics and probability, was largely about data literacy. My second book, Change is the Only Constant, was a human-centered take on calculus.

But when it comes to systemic change, the two are orthogonal at best, and opposites at worst.

Should we dismantle our regime of standardized tests? Or are they a vital tool for measuring the success of a new curriculum?

Should math education impart deep experiences of beauty? Or practical, wage-raising skills?

Should students pursue open-ended, creative thinking? Or develop concrete knowledge with immediate applications?

Is math a liberal art, akin to art or music? Or is it a practical craft, like computer programming or home economics?

Should economic productivity be the guiding principle for secondary education? And if not, then what should be?

I wouldn’t endorse either vision in its purest form. Math education pursues a hodgepodge of goals: quantitative literacy, humanistic growth, preparation for STEM careers. The educators I admire most don’t subscribe to easy dichotomies. They value student voices and factual knowledge, algebraic fluency and open-ended exploration. Myself, I am comfortable with only two universal claims about math education: there are always tensions, and there are always tradeoffs.

That’s why I worry about the illusory consensus around reform. How can we make wise tradeoffs if we don’t acknowledge the tensions?

The solution, I think, is simple: show your work.

Show us what a good lesson (or unit, or year) looks like, and explain why.

I’m trying to do this in my own teaching now: to resolve all these contradictory possibilities in a way that works for my students. It’s not easy! There are days when I do an adequate job, and days when I do quite the opposite.

Anyway, take this as a pledge: in 2025, I’d like to show more of my work. I’m teaching two classes this term: Intro to Statistics, and Liberal Arts Mathematics (a kind of escape hatch for students who don’t want to take college algebra as their final required math class). I approach them both with a muddle of overlapping values, and a desire to do whatever works best for my students’ learning. More forthcoming.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Published
January 20, 2025January 27, 2025



Source link

bad consensus drawings illusory Math reform
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
yhhifa9
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Math

Operations On Whole Numbers | Properties

September 22, 2025
Special Education

Dyscalculia FAQ: The Math Disability Teachers Should Know About

September 21, 2025
Math

Representation of Whole Numbers on Number Line

September 19, 2025
Math

Smooth numbers and max-entropy | What’s new

September 18, 2025
Math

The Ruliology of Lambdas—Stephen Wolfram Writings

September 16, 2025
Math

12 Times Table | Read and Write Multiplication Table of 12 Video Trick

September 13, 2025
View 1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. 🔓 + 1.798496 BTC.NEXT - https://yandex.com/poll/76RuKke5vYn6W1hp2wxzvb?hs=f9a68990d89cf02d1b6a90cc6f2a72ca& 🔓
    🔓 + 1.798496 BTC.NEXT - https://yandex.com/poll/76RuKke5vYn6W1hp2wxzvb?hs=f9a68990d89cf02d1b6a90cc6f2a72ca& 🔓 on June 11, 2025 6:50 am

    9btq1w

    Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

2024 in math puzzles. – Math with Bad Drawings

July 22, 202521 Views

Testing Quantum Theory in Curved Spacetime

July 22, 202514 Views

How AI Is Helping Customer Support Teams Avoid Burnout

May 28, 202510 Views

Chemistry in the sunshine – in C&EN

August 9, 20258 Views
Don't Miss

Can I Use Financial Aid for a Study Abroad Program?

By adminSeptember 23, 20250

248 Are you wondering how to pay for study abroad? You’re not alone! Cost concerns…

What I Wish I Knew Before Starting University | Study in Ireland

September 22, 2025

Meet Four College Students Who Studied Abroad in England

September 19, 2025

Literary Gardens – Global Studies Blog

September 16, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
About Us
About Us

Welcome to Bkngpnarnaul. At Bkngpnarnaul, we are committed to shaping the future of technical education in Haryana. As a premier government institution, our mission is to empower students with the knowledge, skills, and practical experience needed to thrive in today’s competitive and ever-evolving technological landscape.

Our Picks

K-12 Gamification: A Guide For Publishers

September 23, 2025

Can Plantar Fasciitis Cause Knee Pain? Know the Link

September 23, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Copyright© 2025 Bkngpnarnaul All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.