Close Menu
bkngpnarnaul
  • Home
  • Education
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Math
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Teacher
  • E-Learning
    • Educational Technology
  • Health Education
    • Special Education
  • Higher Education
  • IELTS
  • Language Learning
  • Study Abroad

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
What's Hot

K-12 Gamification: A Guide For Publishers

September 23, 2025

Can Plantar Fasciitis Cause Knee Pain? Know the Link

September 23, 2025

The Purpose of a Classroom Observation for Gathering Data

September 23, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Tuesday, September 23
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
bkngpnarnaul
  • Home
  • Education
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Math
    • Physics
    • Science
    • Teacher
  • E-Learning
    • Educational Technology
  • Health Education
    • Special Education
  • Higher Education
  • IELTS
  • Language Learning
  • Study Abroad
bkngpnarnaul
Home»Education»California Argues Trump’s Use of Troops in LA Violated Federal Law
Education

California Argues Trump’s Use of Troops in LA Violated Federal Law

adminBy adminAugust 12, 20252 Comments3 Mins Read0 Views
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
Follow Us
Google News Flipboard Threads
California Argues Trump’s Use of Troops in LA Violated Federal Law
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link


Sherman said that if a crowd threatened a federal facility in Los Angeles, federalized troops could protect it. If that crowd posed “any kind of threat” to local law enforcement, troops could “get in front of them.”

Sherman and others testified about operations that went viral on social media, including when federal agents and troops descended on MacArthur Park on July 7.

An internal memo shown in court said the purpose of having the military in the park was to “demonstrate, through a show of presence, the capacity and freedom of the maneuver of federal law enforcement,” despite no “threat to federal function at this location.”

Sherman testified he objected to federal authorities’ request for military help, citing a low risk to law enforcement. But U.S. Border Chief Patrol Agent Gregory Bovino, who is responsible for all immigration enforcement in California, questioned Sherman’s “loyalty to the country.” Sherman said Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ultimately approved the deployment.

State lawyers also introduced Hegseth statements to the media earlier Monday morning, when he said he was approving military deployment in D.C. and that troops “will stand with their law enforcement partners” because “we did the same thing in Los Angeles.”

Judge Breyer pressed Sherman to answer if he would deploy troops to enforce “an unpopular law,” such as immigration or even tax collection, even without a threat of violence.

“Absolutely,” Sherman said if the mission was aligned with Trump’s and Hegseth’s orders.

National Guard troops stand outside the Metropolitan Detention Center on Sunday in Los Angeles. Tensions in the city remain high after the Trump administration called in the National Guard against the wishes of city leaders following two days of clashes with police during a series of immigration raids.
National Guard troops stand outside the Metropolitan Detention Center on June 8, 2025, in Los Angeles. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

State attorneys also called William B. Harrington, the Army’s deputy chief of staff for Task Force 51, which oversaw the combined 4,700 National Guard troops and Marines deployed to L.A. That was until Friday, when he was relieved of his duties “because I was coming here.”

Harrington testified that troops and leaders were instructed not to perform typical police functions, but only to protect federal property and personnel.

The state’s third and final witness was Ernesto Santacruz Jr., field office director for ICE in L.A. He said the Department of Defense did not specify what they meant when they said they were deployed to “protect” federal law enforcement, but said all of his requests for military assistance in ICE enforcement were granted.

Santacruz was questioned about the types of operations he requested military backup, which he said were daily ICE detainments and once for protection from protestors at one of their detainment facilities. Santacruz said the military intervention was helpful following a “spike of officer assaults” and large-scale protests against ICE detentions.

“They’re presence was definitely a deterrent,” he said.

Before the day ended, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Eric Hamilton moved to dismiss the case, arguing the state had failed to prove the federal government violated the Posse Comitatus Act, but Judge Beyer reserved that judgment for later.

Sherman is scheduled to take the stand again on Tuesday, but this time on behalf of the federal government.

While the courtroom was typically stuffed with more than two dozen lawyers in suits and at least two military members in full dress uniforms, a technical glitch provided a moment of levity. Following a break, after lawyers for the federal government helped the state attorneys so they could project exhibits on computer screens, Judge Breyer made an observation.

“It is a wonderful example of federal and state cooperation,” he said, drawing laughter from the courtroom.



Source link

Argues California Federal Law Troops Trumps Violated
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
yhhifa9
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Education

K-12 Gamification: A Guide For Publishers

September 23, 2025
Education

How I Eliminated (Almost) All Grading Problems In My Classroom

September 22, 2025
Education

Newsom Signs Laws to Resist Trump’s Immigration Crackdown, Including Ban on Masks for ICE Agents

September 21, 2025
Educational Technology

Two Moms and Trump’s Head Start Rule: Child Care Shortages Meet Anti-Immigrant Politics

September 21, 2025
Education

Norton and Discovery Education Unite to Encourage Responsible AI Engagement for Students

September 20, 2025
Education

What Happens to Dual Enrollment Credits After High School?

September 19, 2025
View 2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Jack3274
    Jack3274 on August 12, 2025 6:35 pm

    https://shorturl.fm/eKBNR

    Reply
  2. Leia615
    Leia615 on August 13, 2025 12:18 pm

    https://shorturl.fm/cgtQ7

    Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

2024 in math puzzles. – Math with Bad Drawings

July 22, 202521 Views

Testing Quantum Theory in Curved Spacetime

July 22, 202514 Views

How AI Is Helping Customer Support Teams Avoid Burnout

May 28, 202510 Views

Chemistry in the sunshine – in C&EN

August 9, 20258 Views
Don't Miss

Can I Use Financial Aid for a Study Abroad Program?

By adminSeptember 23, 20250

248 Are you wondering how to pay for study abroad? You’re not alone! Cost concerns…

What I Wish I Knew Before Starting University | Study in Ireland

September 22, 2025

Meet Four College Students Who Studied Abroad in England

September 19, 2025

Literary Gardens – Global Studies Blog

September 16, 2025
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
About Us
About Us

Welcome to Bkngpnarnaul. At Bkngpnarnaul, we are committed to shaping the future of technical education in Haryana. As a premier government institution, our mission is to empower students with the knowledge, skills, and practical experience needed to thrive in today’s competitive and ever-evolving technological landscape.

Our Picks

K-12 Gamification: A Guide For Publishers

September 23, 2025

Can Plantar Fasciitis Cause Knee Pain? Know the Link

September 23, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Loading
Copyright© 2025 Bkngpnarnaul All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.